Stentless Bioprostheses for Aortic Valve Replacement in Calcific Aortic Stenosis

نویسنده

  • Kaan Kirali
چکیده

The classic case of aortic stenosis is a healthy middle-aged patient with/without symptoms, but in practical life, patients with severe calcific aortic valve come with several and severe comorbidities such as advanced age, coronary artery disease, atherosclerotic aorta, significant left ventricular dysfunction. Aortic valve replacement (AVR) is the only options in these patients, and it requires patient-by-patient analysis of clinical, echocardiograhic, and hemo‐ dynamic data with associated pathologies. The curative treatment of calcific aortic valve stenosis is the replacement of the aortic valve with a prosthetic valve, and selection of a perfect prosthetic valve is the main goal to get a successful treatment. But, there is no any perfect heart valve prosthesis which may mimic the characteristics of the normal native aortic valve: excellent hemodynamics, life-long durability, thromboresistance, and excellent implantability. That means that native valve disease will be traded for prosthetic valve disease and the outcome of AVR is affected by the type of prosthetic valve. Mechanical valves are non-limited durable, but have a substantial risk of hematologic complications (thromboemboli, thrombotic obstruction, hemorrhage related life-long anticoagulation therapy) with/without hemolysis potential. In contract, bioprosthetic valves have a low risk of thromboembolism without anticoagulation, but their durability is limited by calcific or noncalcific tissue deterioration. Biological prostheses, especially homografts, are often believed to be the substitute of choice in AVR, but the limited availability of homografts prevents their more broadly usage. To overcome this problem and all possible complications of mechanical valves, xenogenic biological prostheses have been developed. The design of bioprosthetic valves purports to mimic the anatomy of the native aortic valve and their flow characteristics are better than mechanical valves, whereas stentless bioprostheses have hemodynamic performance similar to the healthy native aortic valve. Although stented bioprostheses can be implanted easier,

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Stented bioprostheses in aortic position

INTRODUCTION Biological stented prostheses are currently the main type of prosthetic valve used for aortic valve replacement. The ratio of bioprotheses to mechanical prostheses has switched in the last 15 years; the percentage of biological  prostheses implanted has risen from 30 % to 85 %. Moreover the total number of implanted stented bioprostheses remained stable over the last years despite ...

متن کامل

[Aortic valve replacement with a Cryolife O'Brien stentless bioprosthesis].

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES The Cryolife O'Brien xenograft is a stentless bioprosthesis constructed from noncoronary leaflets from three porcine aortic valves. The aim of this study was to investigate short-term results after aortic valve replacement with this composite xenograft. METHODS Since October 1993, Cryolife O'Brien bioprostheses have been implanted in 210 patients. The patients' mea...

متن کامل

Are stentless valves superior to modern stented valves? A prospective randomized trial.

BACKGROUND It is presumed that stentless aortic bioprostheses are hemodynamically superior to stented bioprostheses. A prospective randomized controlled trial was undertaken to compare stentless versus modern stented valves. METHODS AND RESULTS Patients with severe aortic valve stenosis (n=161) undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR) were randomized intraoperatively to receive either the C-...

متن کامل

Mid term outcome and quality of life after aortic valve replacement in elderly people: mechanical versus stentless biological valves.

OBJECTIVE To assess the benefit for patients older than 65 years of aortic valve replacement with stentless biological heart valves in comparison with mechanical valves. DESIGN Multiple regression analysis of a retrospective follow up study. SETTING Single cardiothoracic centre. PATIENTS Between 1996 and 2001, 392 patients with a mean age of 74 years underwent aortic valve replacement wit...

متن کامل

CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE Mid term outcome and quality of life after aortic valve replacement in elderly people: mechanical versus stentless biological valves

Objective: To assess the benefit for patients older than 65 years of aortic valve replacement with stentless biological heart valves in comparison with mechanical valves. Design: Multiple regression analysis of a retrospective follow up study. Setting: Single cardiothoracic centre. Patients: Between 1996 and 2001, 392 patients with a mean age of 74 years underwent aortic valve replacement with ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2013